Let’s talk

Reporting · Illustrative use case

Regulatory Reporting

Compare prepared reporting fields with supplied source records and bring differences to the team responsible for filing review.

Discuss this workflow
Reporting Field
Quarterly reporting review
1 break
Source Data
Gross AUM $1,250,000,000
Net AUM $1,125,000,000
Leverage Ratio 1.45x
Filing Period Q4 2024
Reporting Draft
Gross AUM $1,250,000,000
Net AUM $1,125,000,000
Leverage Ratio 1.52x
Filing Period Q4 2024
Leverage ratio difference
Review the inputs and calculation assumptions

Illustrative records and figures. Your workflow uses supplied files or configured sources, with mappings, comparison rules, and review steps agreed during setup.

Reporting drafts combine records prepared by different teams. Periods, classifications, or calculation assumptions can differ between a source extract and the draft, leaving reviewers to trace how a value was assembled.

1

Example source records

Portfolio source extract Prepared reporting table
Risk system output file Draft report fields
Administrator data file Filing review worksheet
2

Differences to investigate

Data aggregation methodology differences
Classification and categorization errors
Threshold calculation discrepancies

From comparison to review

Give reporting differences a traceable review.

Choose the source fields, reporting period, and comparison rules, then examine differences with the supporting records. Keep the investigation and review decision together. Your reporting team determines the applicable filing treatment and approves the final submission.

Explore reconciliation

Bring us your workflow.

We’ll work through your source records, comparison rules, and review needs to find where Boagent can help.

Discuss your process